chloro-ephydriad:

everythingcanadian:

ariaste:

wildhaunt:

everkings:

kid-communism:

combatbooty:

1) they expensive bruh 2) none of us kno the dif btwn a fucking diamond and some fancy ass glass ur capitalist rock hierarchy has no control over us

3) mostly mined with slave labor

4) we get excited when our date buys us an appetizer, we don’t even comprehend people buying us rocks that would force us into debt for ten years

5) They aren’t actually that rare and the price is artificially inflated. 

Pro tip from a former Jared’s salesperson: You want a sparkly white rock that will look like a diamond to the untrained eye and will literally cost the price of a nice dinner for two? Created white sapphire. They’re lab grown and cost *pennies* to make, so you can get a 1 or 2 carat white sapphire for like… $30-80 probably. You can get one as huge as you like, perfectly clear, perfectly flawless. And no one will ever be able to tell the difference except a professional appraiser. Also, sapphires are the second-hardest gemstone (right after diamonds) so they are very durable! Very unlikely that they’ll chip or crack. Get that bitch set in sterling silver and you are GOOD TO GO. Whole thing should cost you less than $200 unless you get a fancy band with a lot of extra stones. Of course, created sapphires come in every color of the rainbow, so if you want something more exciting than plain white, you TOTALLY CAN. 

Created sapphires and silver: The poor Millennial’s engagement ring. 

THANK YOU EX-JARED’S BASED GOD. 

the “need” for diamonds was artificially created by an aggressive ad campaign by the de beers corporation in the early 1900s so they could establish a choke hold on the supply, pretend that diamonds were rare (which they really aren’t) and inflate the price a shit ton, it’s all bullshit

Acing History

freelgbtqpia:

What is the idea behind Acing History?

Simply put: to blog about asexuality in history. I’m
passionate about history, and I am asexual. Clearly, I need to combine
these two.

Aces are already researching and talking about asexuality in history. Whether that’s discussions on our community history (video), small tidbits which seem to describe something like asexual people in 17th century Versailles or Ancient Greece, or lists of possible “asexual” people in the past,
there is an interest in this subject. So, the need to understand our
historical context is clearly not just my own. However, the discussions
of asexuality in history are few and far in between, and most do not
rest on any theoretical framework on how to approach studying asexuality
in the past. I want to change this by documenting my own travels
through Ace history: my thoughts on theoretical issues as well as some
hands-on historical work. In addition, I want to collect things I’ve
found on the Ace-ternet and in the library and share it here through
masterposts and book reviews. Hopefully, that will give others starting
points and inspiration for their own reading journeys.

Some things you can expect from me and this blog:

1) I will always list my sources – both academic and relating to
discourse in the asexual community. This way, readers can check where I
got my information and decide for themselves whether or not they think
those sources are credible.

2) This blog tries to be as accessible as possible for everyone. Which means:

A. I’m trying to keep the language simple and understandable for the
lay reader, and explain the historical context as clearly as possible.

B. Making the blog searchable through a coherent categorization of the posts.

C. Making the lay-out of this blog readable for people with disabilities.

D. Provide trigger warnings when necessary.

Acing History